0
0

Chapter 48. Prevention of Substance Abuse

Richard R. Clayton, Ph.D.; Melissa J. H. Segress, M.S.; Crystal A. Caudill, M.P.H.
DOI: 10.1176/appi.books.9781585623440.359197

Sections

Excerpt

Prevention is usually thought of as relevant primarily for children and youths, not adults. For every drug, several potential targets exist in trajectories of drug use for prevention activities. These include 1) initiation; 2) continuation; 3) progression within a drug class to more extensive, intensive use patterns; 4) progression across drug classes; 5) progression to dependence; 6) regression to cessation; and 7) lapse and relapse. The preponderance of research on substance abuse prevention to date has focused on two targets: 1) attempts to reduce the likelihood of initiation (or at least delay onset) and prevalence of use among youths and 2) reducing the likelihood of relapse among adult drug abusers. In this chapter, we concentrate on primarily youth-focused prevention.

Your session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.
Sign In to Access Full Content
 
Username
Password
Sign in via Athens (What is this?)
Athens is a service for single sign-on which enables access to all of an institution's subscriptions on- or off-site.
Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now/Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing PsychiatryOnline@psych.org or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Table Reference Number

Prevention science is still a relatively new area of scientific investigation. Even so, tremendous progress has been made in conducting rigorous research on efficacy and effectiveness, and research on dissemination has ramped up in recent years.

Prevention requires a focus on malleable risk and protective factors that exist at numerous levels. If something cannot be changed, it is not a legitimate target of prevention. To date, more attention has been paid to intraindividual factors that may be malleable than to environmental factors that could be changed and, if changed, could affect many individuals.

Prevention has focused largely on children and youths rather than adults; on initiation of drug use rather than other transition points (continuation, progression within and across drug classes, regression to cessation, and relapse); and on school-based prevention that is curriculum-driven, televised media messages, and the formation and sustenance of community-based coalitions. Little has been done to make prevention more comprehensive and integrated and to parse out the effects of various prevention strategies considered together rather than independently.

Substance abuse is complex. Large individual differences in substance abuse patterns exist, but the biggest return on investment in prevention will focus on covering large segments of the population and accepting a relatively small percentage change rather than having a large effect on a small number of individuals. Prevention as it currently exists does not lend itself well to individual tailoring.

Accumulating evidence indicates that school-based, curriculum-driven prevention programming can be efficacious, but a host of substantive and research issues remain to be solved.

Evidence indicates that media-based prevention strategies can be efficacious, but the knowledge base is suggesting that there are many issues and problems that need to be examined rigorously.

Evidence suggests that community coalitions can have an efficacious effect on substance abuse at the community level, but significantly more work is needed to have an algorithm that seems to work across communities.

Documentation that a prevention effort is efficacious in a controlled setting does not in any way guarantee that it will be effective when disseminated. Studies of effectiveness and dissemination are needed to show compellingly how to take a prevention program to scale.

Those involved in substance abuse prevention are often hard on themselves for not reporting large effects from interventions. A lesson may be learned from the prevention of cardiovascular disease. As many as 20% of the people who receive prescriptions do not even get them filled, and about 50% of the people taking routine medicines take them inconsistently (Miller 1997Miller 1997). After a major national push on hypertension, fewer than 60% of those receiving treatment had the condition "controlled" (Hajjar and Kotchen 2003Hajjar and Kotchen 2003).

The question that has driven the substance abuse prevention field to date is "Does prevention work?" In the coming decades, the question driving the field will be "Prevention works, but for whom, when, where, under what circumstances, why, and how?"

References

Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, et al: Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA 273:1106–1112, 1995
[PubMed]
 
Cameron R, Brown KS, Best JA, et al: Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk. Am J Public Health 89:1827–1831, 1999
[PubMed]
 
Clayton RR: Transitions in drug use: risk and protective factors, in Vulnerabilities to Drug Abuse: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Edited by Glantz M, Pickins R. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1992, pp 15–52
 
Clayton RR, Scutchfield FD, Wyatt SW: Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: a new gold standard in prevention science requires new transdisciplinary thinking. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1964–1965, 2000
[PubMed]
 
Ellickson PL, Bell RM: Drug prevention in junior high: a multi-site longitudinal test. Science 247:1299–1305, 1990
[PubMed]
 
Ellickson PL, Bell RM, McGuigan K: Preventing adolescent drug use: long-term results of a junior high program. Am J Public Health 83:856–861, 1993
[PubMed]
 
Ellickson PL, McCaffrey DF, Ghosh-Dastidar G, et al: New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: results from a large-scale trial of project ALERT in middle schools. Am J Public Health 93:1830–1836, 2003
[PubMed]
 
Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, et al: Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 95:425–431, 2005
[PubMed]
 
Flay BR, Biglan A, Boruch RF, et al: Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prev Sci 6:151–175, 2005
[PubMed]
 
Ghosh-Dastidar B, Longshore D, Ellickson PL, et al: Modifying pro-drug risk factors in adolescents: results from project ALERT. Health Educ Behav 31:318–334, 2004
[PubMed]
 
Hajjar I, Kotchen TA: Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 290:199–206, 2003
[PubMed]
 
Hallfors D, Cho H, Livert D, et al: Fighting back against substance abuse: are community coalitions winning? Am J Prev Med 23:237–245, 2002
[PubMed]
 
Hallfors D, Cho H, Sanchez V, et al: Efficacy vs effectiveness trial results of an indicated "model" substance abuse program: implications for public health. Am J Public Health 96:2254–2259, 2006
[PubMed]
 
Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY: Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood. Psychol Bull 112:64–105, 1992
[PubMed]
 
Holder HD, Gruenewald PJ, Ponicki WR, et al: Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries. JAMA 284:2341–2347, 2000
[PubMed]
 
McKinlay JB, Marceau LD: To boldly go. . . . Am J Public Health 90:25–33, 2000
[PubMed]
 
Miller NH: Compliance with treatment regimens in chronic asymptomatic diseases. Am J Med 102:43–49, 1997
[PubMed]
 
Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ: Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Prevention. Washington, DC, Academy Press, 1994
 
Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Haviland ML: Confirming "truth": more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health 94:255–257, 2004
[PubMed]
 
Orwin R, Cadell D, Chu A, et al: Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: 2004 report of findings [NIDA Web site]. June 2006. Available at: http://www.nida.nih.gov/DESPR/Westat/
 
Palmgreen P, Donohew L, Lorch EP, et al: Televised campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: tests of sensation seeking targeting. Am J Public Health 91:292–296, 2001
[PubMed]
 
Peterson AV, Kealey KA, Mann SL, et al: Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention: results on smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1979–1991, 2000
[PubMed]
 
Sly DF, Hopkins RS, Trapido E, et al: Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida "truth" campaign. Am J Public Health 91:233–238, 2001
[PubMed]
 
St. Pierre TL, Osgood DW, Mincemoyer CC, et al: Results of an independent evaluation of project ALERT delivered in schools by cooperative extension. Prev Sci 6:305–317, 2005
 
Thrasher JF, Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, et al: The impact of anti-tobacco industry prevention messages in tobacco producing regions: evidence from the US truth campaign. Tob Control 13:283–288, 2004
[PubMed]
 
Wakefield M, Terry-McElrath Y, Emery S, et al: Effect of televised, tobacco company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior. Am J Public Health 96:2154–2160, 2006
[PubMed]
 
+

CME Activity

Add a subscription to complete this activity and earn CME credit.
Sample questions:
1.
For every drug, several potential targets exist in trajectories of drug use for prevention activities. The preponderance of research on substance abuse prevention has focused on which of the following targets?
2.
Significant prevention efforts have been devoted to one of the so-called gateway drugs. Which of the following is a gateway drug?
3.
There are several taxonomies of prevention. Which of the following terms refers to prevention in which the focus is on the individual and his or her lifestyle or behavior?
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Related Content
Articles
Books
The American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry, 5th Edition > Chapter 9.  >
Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th Edition > Chapter 17.  >
Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders, 4th Edition > Chapter 18.  >
Dulcan's Textbook of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry > Chapter 17.  >
Topic Collections
Psychiatric News
PubMed Articles
 
  • Print
  • PDF
  • E-mail
  • Chapter Alerts
  • Get Citation